HCV Advocate Logo HCV Advocate Logo
Contact Us Site Map Resources en Espanol
For living Positivley. Being Well
About Hepatitis
News Updates
News Review
Conference reports
News Articles
HCV Advocate Newsletter
Sign up for Email Updates
Community & Support
Resource Library
About Hcsp
Hepatitus C Support Project
 
News Review

Back to News Review

The Best in the News on HCV, HBV, and HIV/HCV Coinfection from September 1st, 2003 thru October 1st, 2003

Alan Franciscus
Editor-in-Chief

  1. Early Virologic Response (EVR) to Treatment with PEG-Intron (peginterferon alfa-2b) Plus Rebetol (ribavirin) in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C
  2. Algorithm for HCV RNA Testing to Identify Patients with Early Virologic Response Treated with Peginterferon Alfa Plus Ribavirin
  3. Finding the Right Combination to Fight Hepatitis C
  4. Vaccination Guide
  5. 12-Month Combination Therapy with Intron A Plus Epivir-HBV Is Effective As Initial Treatment of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B
  6. Kidney Failure a Major Problem in Transplants
  7. High body mass index is a risk factor for nonresponse to treatment in hepatitis C
  8. A Summary Review of Steps in the Management of Chronic Hepatitis C
  9. Oral piercings can lead to gum disease, infections and fractures
  10. Grant targets Southeast Asian health education
  11. Operative morbidity of living liver donors in Japan
  12. Fibromyalgia, Hepatitis C Infection and the Cytokine Connection
  13. Interferon and Ribavirin Safe for Patients with Hepatitis C-Related Renal Insufficiency
  14. Hassan Taps His Buddy List
  15. S.E.C. Penalizes Schering-Plough Over a Fair Disclosure Violation
  16. Hepatitis C virus infection among drug users in Italy
  17. Nigeria bans dangerous relaxant drugs from China
  18. Life-insurance ban is unfair for many with HIV: Study
  19. Prison outreach for the diagnosis and prevention of hepatitis C
  20. Warning of disease risk on body art
  21. Is It Too Late To Save Schering? ; CEO Fred Hassan has a hair-raising task: fixing the drugmaker's problems in the lab, in the plants, and in the market.
  22. Hepatitis C Virus; Early Response to Therapy Allows Accurate Prediction Of Treatment Success
  23. New process prolongs blood platelets' shelf life
  24. North America's first supervised heroin injection site opens
  25. Vancouver Opens Safe-Injection Site for Addicts
  26. Variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis
  27. Effective Methadone Dose Does Not Harm Newborns
  28. Dude! You Call This Medicine?
  29. Description of Entecavir Resistance-associated Mutations
  30. Hepatic injury in patients taking the herbal weight loss aids
  31. Hep C blood 'went untreated'
  32. Isis Optimistic About Latest Antisense Compounds
  33. Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients eligible for transplantation
  34. VA Seeks Former POWs for Possible Benefits
  35. Cheaper Doesn't Mean Better. Ask a Canadian
  36. Matria Healthcare Signs Strategic Disease Management Agreement with Schering Corporation
  37. Predictive factors for early mortality following liver transplantation
  38. Hepatitis Threatens to Wipe Out Two Amazon Tribes
  39. UNICEF hopes to save two ethnic groups in Peru after hepatitis outbreak
  40. Insurers issue new rules on gays
  41. Molluscs could help fight cancer
  42. Hepatitis A Boosters May Be Unnecessary
  43. 'Whitey' from 'Leave It to Beaver' Dies
  44. Sex with Strangers Dogging English Parks
  45. Obesity Predicts Poor Response to Hepatitis C Treatment
  46. Ribavirin ANDAs Still Waiting For FDA; Other Generic Issues Have Priority
  47. Hepatitis virus could be passed on by kissing
  48. State grant provides Broward fire-rescue workers with free hepatitis C tests
  49. Hepatitis C seen as 'the new epidemic'. Virus is four times more common than HIV, experts say
  50. Nucleonics Receives NIH Grant Supporting Research Partnership Aimed at Developing RNAi Approach to Treatment of Hepatitis B Infections
  51. Herbal Web sites not always honest
  52. Obesity as a risk factor for cirrhosis-related death or hospitalization
  53. Transmission of Hepatitis B and C Viruses in Outpatient Settings—New York, Oklahoma, and Nebraska, 2000--2002
  54. Neb. Dr. in Hepatitis Case Loses License
  55. Probe Ends in Schering-Plough Drug Case



September 1st, 2003

Early Virologic Response (EVR) to Treatment with PEG-Intron (peginterferon alfa-2b) Plus Rebetol (ribavirin) in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C
by hivandhepatitis.com

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) replicates at a rapid rate, producing between 1010 and 1012 viral particles per day that have a half-life of only a few hours. Thus, virus levels decline rapidly when a potent antiviral agent such as interferon inhibits replication.

Viral kinetic studies have shown that the first phase of viral decay occurs within 24 to 48 hours after a dose, is rapid, and results in HCV RNA level reductions of up to 4 logs. However, this early initial decline in HCV RNA levels correlates poorly with the eventual response to interferon-based therapy.

Rather, treatment response correlates best with the subsequent slow, prolonged, and more variable period of viral decline referred to as phase 2 decay. The rate of phase 2 decay correlates closely with sustained virologic response (SVR) to interferon-based treatment regimens. Thus, it might be anticipated that changes in virus level over the first several weeks of therapy might correlate closely with the likelihood of ultimate eradication of HCV.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether early changes in HCV RNA levels during treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin could be used to accurately predict treatment response. Because early discontinuation of treatment in nonresponders could avoid the expense and inconvenience of continuing unnecessary treatment, the researchers also examined the potential cost savings of strategies that would use early virologic response (EVR) to develop early stopping rules for such patients.

Data from the recent international clinical trial reported by Manns et al. comparing pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-Intron; Schering Corp., Kenilworth, NJ) plus oral ribavirin (Rebetol; Schering Corp.) with standard interferon (Intron A; Schering Corp.) and ribavirin was evaluated retrospectively to determine whether EVR could predict treatment outcome.

The investigators most closely evaluated treatment responses in the 511 subjects who were randomized to pegylated interferon alfa-2b at a dose of 1.5 microgram/kg each week and 800 mg/d of oral ribavirin (PEG/R) because this regimen was licensed by the Food and Drug Administration.

However, they also examined the subgroup of patients (n = 174) from the above group who received pegylated interferon alfa-2b at a dose of 1.5 microgram/kg each week and a dose of ribavirin that was at least 10.6 mg/kg/d (PEG/R >10.6), the so-called weight-based dosing regimen, because this is the approved standard of care outside the United States and may represent a more optimal dosing regimen.

Finally, the researchers also looked for comparison at the 505 subjects randomized to standard interferon at a dose of 3 million units 3 times per week plus 1,000 to 1,200 mg/d of ribavirin (1,000 mg/d for a pretreatment weight <75 kg and 1,200 mg for weight >75 kg) (I/R).

All subjects were treated for 48 weeks and provided informed consent for the study, and the ethics committee at each clinical site approved the study. The databases for the study were created and maintained by the study sponsor.

The researchers examined the accuracy of different degrees of viral inhibition during the early weeks of treatment (early virologic response [EVR]) with pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin (PEG/R) in identifying patients who would not respond to therapy.

The best definition of EVR was a reduction in hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by at least 2 logs after the first 12 weeks of treatment compared with baseline. Between 69% and 76% of patients achieved this threshold, depending on the treatment regimen, and sustained virologic response (SVR) occurred in 67% to 80% of these patients. Patients who did not reach EVR did not respond to further therapy.

If treatment had been stopped in patients without EVR, drug costs would have been reduced by more than 20% [Emphasis added-Ed].

In conclusion, the authors state, "Early confirmation of viral reduction following initiation of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C is worthwhile. It provides a goal to motivate adherence during the first months of therapy and a milepost at which to reassess the need for continued treatment. Most patients who are able to complete the first 12 weeks of therapy achieve EVR and have a high probability of SVR."

"Patients who fail to achieve EVR will not clear virus even if additional months of therapy is received. Therapy can be confidently discontinued in those cases."

Back to top



Algorithm for HCV RNA Testing to Identify Patients with Early Virologic Response Treated with Peginterferon Alfa Plus Ribavirin
by hivandhepatitis.com

Following is a new algorithm for HCV RNA testing designed to identify peginterferon plus ribavirin-treated patients with an early viral response (EVR) to therapy. These patients have a high probability of achieving a sustained viral response (SVR). The algorithm also will identify those treated patients without EVR in whom treatment justifiably may be discontinued.

Quantitative HCV RNA testing is recommended at baseline and at week 12 of therapy in patients with genotype 1. EVR (decrease in HCV RNA > 2 logs compared with baseline or undetectable by PCR at week 12 of therapy) is associated with a high chance of response and justifies continuation of treatment.

Those who have at least a 2-log decrease in HCV RNA but remain HCV RNA positive by PCR should have HCV RNA retested by PCR at 24 weeks.

Because no patient without at least a 2-log decrease in HCV RNA at 12 weeks subsequently achieved SVR, the lack of EVR usually justifies discontinuation of therapy.

Patients with genotypes 2 or 3 have a high chance of achieving EVR and SVR. Retesting of HCV RNA during treatment is not cost-effective in these cases.

Back to top



Finding the Right Combination to Fight Hepatitis C
by Linda Marsa

Just half of the millions of Americans infected with hepatitis C respond to treatment, while others who are infected live with the constant threat that their health could suddenly, and fatally, deteriorate. But a new drug could help improve these odds.

When used with the antiviral drug interferon, the drug Zadaxin could help thousands of patients better fight HCV. "This medication looks promising for people who don't respond to other drugs," said Dr. Sammy Saab, liver specialist at UCLA's David Geffen School of Medicine. "It may also be used as part of a combination drug cocktail for all hepatitis C sufferers, since it seems to work by a different mechanism of action than other medications," added Saab.

Current HCV treatment - a combination of interferon and Ribarvirin - helps only half of those with active infections and less than a third who are infected with the more prevalent and more dangerous form of hepatitis C known as genotype 1.

Zadaxin is a synthetic version of thymosin alpha 1, a naturally occurring protein that stimulates the production of certain immune system cells. The drug, which has no apparent side effects, is approved for sale in 30 countries as an antiviral drug to treat hepatitis B but only in a few countries to fight hepatitis C.

However, results of a US study using Zadaxin to treat HCV were encouraging. The test involved 31 patients with high levels of genotype 1 who had not responded to standard therapy. Zadaxin, used in combination with interferon, greatly reduced levels of HCV in up to 36 percent of the patients.

The findings were particularly significant because patients who do not respond to the initial round of treatment rarely benefit from subsequent therapy. "We purposely chose the most difficult of the most-difficult-to-treat patients," said researcher Di Bisceglie. Zadaxin is in the final phase of US trials.

Around 4 million Americans are infected with HCV, and about 2.7 million of those have an active infection in which the liver is inflamed. Hepatitis C, which kills 10,000 people a year, is the leading cause for liver transplants in the United States.

Back to top


September 2nd, 2003


Vaccination Guide

If you're wondering which diseases you should be immunized against, the University of Southern California offers these recommendations:
* Tetanus: Everyone should get a booster shot every 10 years.
* Rubella (German Measles): For health care workers and women of childbearing age.
* Hepatitis A: For people at high risk, including intravenous drug users, homosexuals, institutionalized people and people traveling to or living in areas where it is endemic.
* Hepatitis B and C: High-risk adults such as dialysis patients and health care workers should get the hepatitis B vaccination and should get tested for hepatitis C, because symptoms often don't show up for years. There isn't a vaccination for hepatitis C.
* Pneumonia: For people over 65, plus diabetics and people who have had their spleens removed or suffer chronic heart, lung or liver disease.
* Influenza: Annual flu shots are recommended for the same group of people who should get pneumonia shots.
* Travelers: If you're planning to visit another country, you should contact its nearest consulate to ask whether specific vaccinations are recommended or required.

Back to top


September 3rd, 2003


12-Month Combination Therapy with Intron A Plus Epivir-HBV Is Effective As Initial Treatment of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B
by hivandhepatitis.com

Researchers in Turkey studied the use of prolonged synchronous combination therapy with Intron A (interferon (IFN)-alfa 2b) and Epivir-HBV (lamivudine) with the use of IFN alfa-2b monotherapy in patients with untreated hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Thirty-three patients received therapy with lamivudine (100 mg daily) and IFN alfa-2b (10 million U 3 times per week) for 12 months; 16 patients received IFN alfa-2b alone (10 million U 3 times per week for 12 months).

The primary end point was sustained suppression of HBV DNA and HBeAg seroconversion, which was observed in 15 (45%) of 33 patients treated with combination therapy and in 3 (19%) of 16 patients treated with monotherapy (P = .133). Both therapeutic regimens were well tolerated.

Combination therapy increased the rate of sustained suppression of HBeAg and resulted in significant improvement in Knodell histologic activity index scores, compared with monotherapy. However, there was no significant difference in rates of sustained suppression between the 2 groups at the end of follow-up.

Discussion
Until now, the short-term use of IFN-alfa alone or in combination with lamivudine has not been reported to be effective for treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. Data on combination therapy are few and are restricted to studies of courses of treatment of 4 6 months' duration. Moreover, the 4 published trials of combination therapy provide little support for the use of the IFN alfa lamivudine combination.

Also, the design of the initial studies of combination therapy may not have been optimal for showing the full effects of combination therapy. On the other hand, in many controlled trials, it has been shown that there was an increased clearance of both HBeAg and HBV DNA after prolonged IFN alfa therapy, compared with treatment for the standard period of 16 weeks.

The current study demonstrates that administration of combination therapy for 12 months to HBeAg-positive patients induces rapid inhibition of viral replication, normalization of liver function, and histologic evidence of improvement in liver disease.

The study found a high rate of HBeAg seroconversion (54% of patients) after 12 months of combination therapy, a finding that is not in accordance with the seroconversion rate of 29% after 16 weeks of combination therapy reported by Schalm et al., nor with the seroconversion rate of 33% after 24 weeks of therapy reported by Barbaro et al.

The enhanced efficacy of prolonged treatment was so pronounced that, in future treatment regimens that include combination therapy, prolongation of therapy for up to 52 weeks should be considered.

Unfortunately, despite the impressive HBeAg seroconversion rates achieved at month 24, the difference in sustained response rates between the 2 groups remained non-significant at that time. Viral persistence was observed after anti-HBeAg seroconversion in 3 patients in the combination therapy group, and this influenced the level of significance.

Histologic evidence of improvement in liver disease is a significant marker of biologic improvement after therapy, especially when the number of patients is low. In the present study, combination therapy significantly reversed necroinflammatory activity, compared with IFN alfa mono-therapy. This large benefit occurred regardless of patients' HBeAg sero- conversion status and treatment response status in the combination therapy group.

The 84% rate of improvement in hepatic inflammation observed in these study patients was higher than the rate of 46% reported by Barbaro et al., the rate of 56% after 1 year of lamivudine therapy reported by Lai et al., and the rate of 54% after a 24-month course of IFN alfa therapy reported by Lampertico et al. Adding a prolonged course of IFN alfa therapy to a course of lamivudine therapy seems to double the substantial beneficial effect of lamivudine on liver disease.

In the present study, both treatment regimens were safe and well tolerated, and the efficacy of concomitant IFN alfa and lamivudine therapy appears to be better than that of IFN alfa monotherapy and the previously studied sequential administration of IFN and lamivudine.
Several factors may possibly explain this difference:

(1) A synchronous combination regimen is superior to a sequential combination regimen;
(2) A prolonged course of combination therapy is more effective than shorter course of combination therapy;
(3) Combination therapy is better than monotherapy; and
(4) Patients enrolled in this study tended to have a higher mean ALT levels, a higher HAI score, and a lower stage of fibrosis.

The authors conclude, "We conclude that IFN alfa and lamivudine combination therapy, in combination with a longer duration of therapy, appears to be a therapeutic regimen and might be considered for the initial treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B."

Back to top



Kidney Failure a Major Problem in Transplants
by Ed Edelson
HealthDay Reporter

Kidney failure is a disturbingly high risk for all transplant patients, says the largest survey ever done.

Ironically, the major cause of those kidney failures is an unavoidable side effect of the rejection-suppressing drugs that made transplantation possible, experts say.

"The five-year risk of chronic renal [kidney] failure after transplantation of a non-renal organ ranges from 7 to 21 percent, depending on the type of organ transplanted," says a report in the Sept. 4 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine by transplant specialists at the University of Michigan.

Kidney failure in those patients more than quadruples the risk of death, the researchers say.

"The magnitude of the problem is much higher than what one would expect based on what we see day-to-day in the clinic," says study leader Dr. Akinlolu O. Ojo, an associate professor of medicine at Michigan. "A number of 20 percent is higher than one would come up with if one had to make a guess."

The numbers come from a study of nearly 70,000 persons who received other-than-kidney transplants (liver, heart, lung, heart-lung or intestine) in the United States in the 1990s. Overall, 11,426 of those patients suffered kidney failure in the first three years after surgery, an incidence of 16.5 percent.

"While this report does not specifically say so, previous work would suggest that the main cause of kidney disease that arises after transplantation are these drugs," says Dr. Colin C. Magee, a staff physician in the renal division of Brigham and Women's Hospital, the teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School.

Two drugs are the mainstays of efforts to prevent the immune attack that kills transplanted tissues -- cyclosporine, whose appearance in the early 1980s revolutionized transplantation, and tacrolimus, which was introduced later.

"It is important to remember that these are drugs are lifesaving drugs," Magee says. "Without these drugs, transplantation would not be possible."

But the high incidence of kidney failure after transplantation not only worsens the quality of life but also can translate into a requirement for artificial kidney treatment or kidney transplants for many thousands of patients, which can strain medical resources, Magee says. While fewer than 1 percent of Medicare patients have kidney failure, they account for almost 6 percent of the Medicare budget, the editorial says.

There are ways to lessen the problem, Ojo and Magee say. It might be possible to use lower doses of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in selected patients, and to use newer rejection-preventing drugs in those patients, Magee says. But doctors will be cautious about changing the existing regimens, because any new dosage schedules might not be as effective, he says.

Ojo proposes a strategy based on other findings of the survey — that a number of factors other than drug therapy contribute to the risk of kidney failure. Those factors include older age, being a woman, having hepatitis C infection, high blood pressure and diabetes, the survey shows. Those factors can be combined in a formula to determine a patient's overall risk, he says.

"We need a way to stratify people before they get transplants so that we could reduce the amount of drugs we use or use the newer drugs in these patients to avoid toxicity," Ojo says. But he advises caution in use of the newer drugs, because they may not be as effective in preventing rejection as the two older medications.

Transplant centers, including the one at Michigan, are not now using the risk-stratifying strategy because the risk factors have not been laid out clearly, Ojo says. The surgery results may help promote the strategy, he says.

Back to top


September 4th, 2003


High body mass index is a risk
factor for nonresponse to treatment in hepatitis C

by gastrohep.com

Physicians from Canada find that obesity is an independent negative predictor of patients' response to hepatitis C treatment.

The aim of this study, published in the latest issue of Hepatology (Hepatology 2003; 38: 639-44), was to determine whether body mass index (BMI) predicts response to antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C.

A team of doctors performed a retrospective review of all patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with antiviral medication at a single center, between 1989 and 2000.

They defined a sustained response as either negative hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by PCR and/or a normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level 6 months after the completion of treatment.

The team divided patients into 3 groups according to their BMI. These were <25 kg/m2 (normal), 25 to 30 kg/m2 (overweight), and >30 kg/m2 (obese).

A total of 253 patients were treated with either interferon (IFN) monotherapy or IFN in combination with ribavirin.

Patients were excluded if predetermined clinical characteristics were unavailable.

Hepatic steatosis was not an independent risk factor for response to antiviral treatment.

The team used logistic regression to analyze the data.

After adjusting for several variables, they found that there were significant differences in the patients' response to treatment according to BMI group, virus genotype, and cirrhosis.

Patients with genotypes 2 or 3 had an odds ratio (OR) for success of 11.7 when compared with those with genotype 1.

In addition, the team determined that cirrhotic patients had an OR of 0.15 compared with noncirrhotic patients, and obese patients had an OR of 0.23 compared with normal and overweight patients.

However, the researchers did not find that hepatic steatosis was an independent risk factor for response to antiviral treatment.

Dr Brian Bressler's team concluded, "Obesity, only when defined as a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, is an independent (of genotype and cirrhosis) negative predictor of response to hepatitis C treatment.

Back to top


September 5th, 2003

A Summary Review of Steps in the Management of Chronic Hepatitis C
by hivandhepatitis.com

Treatment options for chronic HCV infection have evolved significantly over the last few years, and current therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is effective in 50% to 60% of patients with previously untreated infection.

Although there is some encouraging progress in new antiviral drug development for hepatitis C, it will be several years before any of these novel compounds are available in clinical practice.

In the interim, pegylated interferon and ribavirin remain the cornerstone of therapy. Healthcare providers have an important role in educating and selecting appropriate patients for therapy, recognizing common side effects, establishing a team approach to the management of chronic HCV infection, and keeping abreast of changes in treatment guidelines.

Following are brief excerpts on approaches to the treatment and management of chronic HCV from an article by Drs. Keyur Patel and John G. McHutchison.

Before initiating therapy, ensure there are no contraindications to interferon alfa (or peginterferon) and ribavirin.

These include:

For Interferon Alfa or Peginterferon Alfa:
* Decompensated liver disease
* Autoimmune hepatitis
* Severe neuropsychiatric illness
* Unstable coronary artery disease
* Unstable epilepsy
* Poorly controlled diabetes

For Ribavirin:
* Anemia (hemoglobin, <11 g/dL)
* Hemoglobinopathies (thalassemia major, sickle cell disease)
* Ischemic heart disease
* Cerebrovascular disease
* Pregnancy
* Refusal to practice barrier contraception
* Chronic renal impairment (creatinine clearance, <50 mL/min)

There are 10 steps with which patient and physician should move forward:

1. Ensure there are no contraindications to therapy.
2. Assess carefully for comorbid conditions (including depression, hypothyroidism, cardiac disease, and diabetes) that should be evaluated and controlled before starting antiviral therapy.
3. Determine HCV genotype and HCV RNA level.
4. Obtain liver biopsy to assess disease severity.
5. Discuss with the patient the side effects and possible treatment outcomes.
6. If appropriate, start therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin.
a) Determine dose of ribavirin according to genotype and weight.
b) Continue treatment for 24 or 48 weeks, according to genotype.
7. Perform laboratory monitoring.* (see Table 1).
8. Carefully perform a clinical evaluation monthly (or more often) for depression and other side effects; assess treatment adherence.
9. For genotype 1 infection, measure HCV RNA level at week 12.
a) Continue treatment for another 36 weeks if the patient has an early
virologic response.
b) Consider terminating therapy if there is no early virologic response.
10. Measure HCV RNA level at end of treatment. If HCV RNA is still not present at 6 months post-therapy (a sustained response), long-term eradication is likely to have occurred.

Table 1. A proposed laboratory monitoring schedule during combination therapy monitoring schedule during combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C



* Pregnancy tests should continue to be given every month for 6 months post-therapy.
** Except in patients with genotype 2 or 3 infection.


Back to top



Oral piercings can lead to gum disease, infections and fractures
by Frank D. Roylance

People who jab gold studs through their lips and pierce their tongues with silver bars are not usually eager to hear a lecture on gum disease.

But Dr. John K. Brooks tries anyway: Oral jewelry, the dentist tells them, can cost you a tooth.

"The patients I've been successful with are the ones that had pain and infection. They're much more ready to be convinced," Brooks says.

Brooks and two colleagues at the University of Maryland Dental School say there is growing clinical evidence that oral piercings increase the risk of gum disease, painful infections and tooth loss.

They present their case in the July issue of the Journal of the American Dental Association. "The profession does not advocate people wearing piercings," Brooks says, "and we want to discourage those people who wear piercings."

With professors Kenny A. Hooper and Mark A. Reynolds, Brooks' report on five patients who suffered gum loss and other dental problems were traced to their lip and tongue studs.

People who insist on wearing studs in their mouths "have to maintain exquisite oral hygiene, brushing and flossing," says Brooks. But even so, "there is no escaping that they will be at risk for damage to their gums and their teeth."

One of the subjects, a healthy 19-year-old with a barbell-shaped stud in her tongue, developed a case of worsening gum disease where the jewelry rubbed against the inside of a lower front tooth.

Another patient, a 24-year-old woman, came to the dental school's clinic complaining of painful teeth. She has lost a significant amount of the gum in front of her lower front teeth, next to her lip stud. The dentist also found related bone loss. Warned of the damage, the woman agreed to quit wearing the lip jewelry, the journal article says.

Chips and fractures
The JADA paper is the latest of several that have appeared in medical literature since 1997, raising alarms about the dental consequences of oral piercing. There have been no large-scale studies so far, and the warnings are based on reports of a few dozen individual cases.

The most common injuries are chips and fractures—in as many as 80 percent of the patients in one small survey cited by Brooks. Twenty percent of patients in another small survey had suffered at least some gum loss adjacent to their studs.

But that's not likely to come as news to many piercees.

"I chipped a tooth on it when I first got it," says Julia Racicot, 24, who works in the bookstore at the Maryland Institute College of Art and has worn a barbell in the center of her tongue since she was 19.

But she removes the stud, cleans it regularly, and goes to the dentist every six months. "I don't have any gum disease or anything else," Racicot says

At MICA, where students say you're likely to stand out if you don't have anything pierced, there are stories of students who aren't so lucky.

Racicot said she heard of one young man who complained that his labret (a lip stud) was "pulling down" his gum. "His dentist told him, 'I'll fix it for you for free if you'll take (the labret) out,' " Racicot says. The man took the advice and began warning others about the danger.

Wear and tear on the gums
Reynolds, co-author of the JADA paper and a gum disease specialist, says the association between oral jewelry and gum disease seems clear: Gum loss occurs near studs, in places where young people without the jewelry rarely experience it.

How does this happen?
Brooks says the relentless wear and tear on the gums leads to chronic inflammation as the body tries to guard against infection, remodel and repair the tissues. The gum tissue breaks down and deeper down "you begin to have destruction of the tissues that hold the gum to the roots," he says.

Bacteria that live naturally in the mouth rush in, and their chemical byproducts create pockets behind the gums. More food and bacteria accumulate, adding to the damage. The consequences are pain, infection and tooth loss.

As if that weren't enough, the medical literature has reported cases in which oral piercings have led to hepatitis, tetanus, angina, heart-valve infections, brain and breast abscesses and inflammation of the sac that surrounds the heart.

Piercing risks

* Infection. Infection is a possibility with any opening in skin or oral tissues. Given that the mouth is teeming with bacteria, oral piercing carries a high potential for infection at the site of the piercing. Handling the jewelry once it has been placed also increases infection risk.
* Prolonged bleeding. Damage to the tongue's blood vessels can cause serious blood loss.
* Swelling. Swelling is common after oral piercing. Unlike an earlobe that is pierced, the tongue is in constant motion, which can complicate the healing process. There have been some reports of tongue swelling serious enough to block the airway.
* Bloodborne disease transmission. Oral piercing has been identified by the National Institutes of Health as a possible factor in transmission of hepatitis B, C, D and G.
* Endocarditis. Oral piercing carries a potential risk of endocarditis, a serious inflammation of the heart valves or tissues. The wound created during oral piercing provides an opportunity for oral bacteria to enter the bloodstream, where they can travel to the heart. This presents a risk for people who have cardiac abnormalities, on which the bacteria can colonize.
* Injury to gums. Metal jewelry can injure gums, and if placed so it makes constant contact with the gums, can cause them to recede.
* Damage to teeth. Contact with the jewelry can chip or crack teeth. Teeth that have restorations can be damaged if jewelry strikes them.
* Interference with oral function. Oral jewelry can stimulate excessive saliva production, impede the ability to pronounce words clearly, and cause problems with chewing or swallowing. Metal alloys used to make oral jewelry may cause allergic contact dermatitis.
* Interference with oral health evaluation. Jewelry in the mouth can block the transmission of X-rays. Clear X-rays are essential to a complete oral health evaluation. Jewelry can prevent an X-ray from revealing abnormalities such as cysts, abscesses or tumors.
*Aspiration. As with any loose object in the mouth, jewelry that comes unfastened can be a choking hazard.

Source: American Dental Association

Back to top



Grant targets Southeast Asian health education
Barbara Anderson

Southeast Asian immigrants will learn how to prevent and manage diabetes and hepatitis B under a program that trains lay members of the community to teach the causes, signs and symptoms of the diseases.

The Khmer Society of Fresno received a three-year, $413,235 grant for the Southeast Asian Community Health Cluster Project from The California Endowment.

The grant will enable the society to hire three people who are fluent in Southeast Asian languages and aware of the culture. Sequoia Community Health Foundation will train the lay health workers on how to provide health education in family homes.

The Khmer Society of Fresno cites a 2000 Fresno County Southeast Asian Health Promotion Survey that found Cambodian and Laotian communities have high rates of diabetes and hepatitis B, yet are unaware of the diseases' causes and symptoms.

"Most of our folk don't know what is hepatitis B and what is diabetes," said Tia Lam, executive director of the Khmer Society of Fresno. "All of a sudden they get it, and they're not aware of how they get it."

The health cluster project will be the first time the community will have an opportunity to learn about the diseases in its own language, she said.

The grant will focus primarily on Cambodian and Laotian communities, but will be available to any Southeast Asian in need of the services, Lam said. The goal is to serve a minimum of 200 adults annually.

The three-year grant will "ensure that Southeast Asian communities in Fresno have access to the culturally competent services they need," according to a statement from The Endowment's program officer, Carole Chamberlain.

The Endowment, a private statewide health foundation, will present a check to The Khmer Society of Fresno on Friday at a traditional Buddhist blessing. The society is a Cambodian, community-based nonprofit agency that supports Cambodian and Laotian families in obtaining self-sufficiency through employment, education and cultural preservation.

Back to top



Operative morbidity of living liver donors in Japan

In contrast to western countries, no perioperative mortality has been recorded in living liver donors in Japan, find researchers in the latest issue of the Lancet (Lancet 2003; 362: 687-90).

Deaths of living liver donors have been reported in western countries.

However, the morbidity and mortality of living liver donors in Japan has not been studied.

In this study, a team of physicians reviewed the operative morbidity and mortality of these donors.

They studied 1853 donors of 1852 living liver transplants at 46 centers.

These donors were registered in the database of the Japanese Liver Transplantation Society.

Overall, the team analyzed the data of 1841 donors for 8 donor-related factors of morbidity and mortality.

Complications were significantly higher in right lobe donors.

No perioperative mortality was recorded between the inception of the liver transplantation program in 1989 and 2002.

The researchers found that there were 244 postoperative complications were reported in 228 donors.

They determined that complications were significantly higher in right lobe donors, compared to those involving the lateral segment, and the left lobe.

Furthermore, postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in right lobe donors.

The doctors found that re-operation, related to donor hepatectomy, occurred in 23 donors.

Dr Koji Umeshita's team concluded, "By contrast with western countries, no perioperative mortality was recorded in living liver donors in Japan".

"However, a proportion of these donors developed serious complications".

"This morbidity should be reduced to maintain zero mortality in living liver donors".

Back to top



Fibromyalgia, Hepatitis C Infection and the Cytokine Connection
by hivandhepatitis.com

Fibromyalgia and chronic hepatitis C infection share many clinical features including prominent somatic complaints such as musculo-skeletal pain and fatigue. There is a growing body of evidence supporting a link between cytokines and somatic complaints.

This review by researchers in the Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, discusses alterations of cytokines in fibromyalgia, including increased serum levels of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-2 receptor, IL-8, IL-1 receptor antagonist; increased IL-1 and IL-6 produced by stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cell in patients with FM for longer than 2 years.

Other cytokine alterations discussed include:

* increased gp130, which is a neutrophil cytokine transducing protein;
* increased soluble IL-6 receptor and soluble IL-1 receptor antagonist only in patients with fibromyalgia who are depressed; and
* IL-1 beta, IL-6, and TNF-a by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in skin biopsies of some patients with fibromyalgia.

In addition, this review describes the mechanism by which alterations in cytokines in fibromyalgia and chronic hepatitis C infection can produce hyperalgesia and other neurally mediated symptoms through the presence of cytokine receptors on glial cells and opiate receptors on lymphocytes and the influence of cytokines on the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-a activating and IL-2 and IFN-a down-regulating the HPA axis, respectively.

The association between chronic hepatitis C infection and fibromyalgia is discussed, including a description of key cytokine changes in chronic hepatitis C infection. Future studies are encouraged to further characterize these immunologic alterations with potential pathophysiologic and therapeutic implications.

Back to top



September 8th, 2003


Interferon and Ribavirin Safe for Patients with Hepatitis C-Related Renal Insufficiency
By Emma Hitt, PhD

Interferon and ribavirin appear to be safe for use in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related vasculitis and glomerulonephritis, irrespective of renal function, a small study published in Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:1573-1580 suggests.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with kidney problems, including glomerulonephritis and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. HCV is generally treated with interferon and ribavirin, but ribavirin is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency due to concerns with side effects.

Annette Bruchfeld, MD, with the Department of Clinical Science at the Karolinska Institute, Sweden, and colleagues treated 7 patients with a combination of interferon (2 of whom received pegylatedinterferon) and ribavirin (average daily dose of 200 to 800 mg).

Two of the patients had cryoglobulinaemia, vasculitic manifestations, and glomeru-lonephritis; 4 had membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis; and 1 had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. All had renal insufficiency, with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 10 and 65 mL/min. One patient had HCV genotype 1, the rest had HCV genotype 2 and 3. Patients were treated for 6 to 12 months depending on genotype.

Six of the patients became HCV-RNA-PCR negative, and 4 out of 7 maintained both virological and renal remission, while 1 patient maintained virological and partial renal remission. One patient did not tolerate interferon but achieved renal remission with low-dose ribavirin. One vasculitis patient went into complete remission, but relapsed virologically and had a minor vasculitic flare after 9 months.

"Only one patient with vasculitis had low-dose immunosuppression in addition to anti-viral therapy," the researchers note. In addition, ribavirin-induced anaemia was managed in 5 of the 7 patients with low-dose iron and erythropoietin.

"In our experience it is reasonably safe to use interferon and ribavirin in HCV-related vasculitis and GN irrespective of renal function," Dr. Bruchfeld and colleagues conclude. "However, the use of ribavirin in renal insufficiency should be used with caution and ribavirin plasma monitoring as well as surveillance of side effects is recommended," they add.

They suggest that implementing interferon and ribavirin treatment could improve treatment options for HCV-related renal disease "and form a foundation for controlled clinical studies in the field."

Back to top



Hassan Taps His Buddy List
by Matthew Herper

Several weeks after Schering-Plough slashed its dividend by 68% and announced plans to trim 1,000 jobs through an early retirement program, Chief Executive Fred Hassan says that the Kenilworth, N.J.-based company continues to lose market share for its top four drugs. But he still hopes to affect a turnaround, just as he did at his last company, Peapack, N.J.-based Pharmacia. To do that, he is calling in some help.

Hassan announced this morning that he has tapped Michael J. DuBois to run global licensing at Schering. Like Carrie Cox, who is global head of pharmaceuticals at Schering, he held the exact same position at Pharmacia before it was bought by Pfizer for $60 billion in April. DuBois will report directly to Hassan.

His job will be an important one. Schering's top sellers are hobbled. Hassan noted that sales of Claritin, once the world's best-selling allergy pill, have "evaporated." Patients have not switched to a very similar follow-up, Clarinex, as quickly as Schering hoped. Its hepatitis C medicines, Rebetol and Peg-Intron, are facing tough competition from a new entrant from Roche, a Basel, Switzerland-based drug giant. Nasonex, a steroidal nasal spray used to treat allergies, is also losing market share, although Hassan hopes he can turn that around.

There are three ways for Schering to grow. First, it can introduce new medicines. Hassan said he sees a promising pipeline, but developing new drugs can take a long time. Second, the company has lot riding on Zetia, a cholesterol medicine that Schering is co-developing with Merck. If the two companies can show that a combination of Zetia and Merck's Zocor is safer or more effective than existing cholesterol medicines, the combination could become a mega-blockbuster. But it could take years to convince doubters that the combination clears arteries or prevents heart attacks as well as existing drugs.

In the meantime, there is the third path: find new drugs being developed by other companies or academic labs, and license the right to sell them for a cut of the profits. But the competition for such deals is fierce. This morning, French drug giant Aventis announced that it will pay up to $510 million to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for a drug that is only in the first of three stages of clinical trials. And Schering looks weak right now, which may not make it exactly the partner of choice.

DuBois could face a tough task finding new medicines to license. His boss could face an even tougher task getting Schering on course.

Back to top



September 10th, 2003



S.E.C. Penalizes Schering-Plough Over a Fair Disclosure Violation
by Floyd Norris

Using inside information, institutional investors were able to save tens of millions of dollars by selling stock before the public found out how badly profits were deteriorating at Schering-Plough, the Securities and Exchange Commission said yesterday.

The commission brought administrative proceedings against the drug company and its former chief executive, Richard J. Kogan. It issued cease-and-desist orders barring future violations of Regulation FD, for fair disclosure. But it took no action against the institutions that profited from the inside information.

Schering-Plough agreed to pay a $1 million penalty, the largest imposed for a violation of the fair disclosure regulation. Mr. Kogan, who has retired from the company, agreed to pay $50,000. He is the first individual to be penalized for violating Regulation FD, which was adopted more than two years ago. Neither admitted nor denied the accusations.

''Fair disclosure means creating a level playing field for all investors,'' said Stephen M. Cutler, the commission's director of enforcement. ''Bestowing an informational advantage on a select few at the expense of others undermines investor confidence and cannot be tolerated.''

Schering-Plough shares closed at $21.32 on Sept. 30, 2002, before beginning a fall that cut 17.6 percent from the share price over three days without the company making any public announcement. That came as Mr. Kogan met with executives of four institutional investors on the evening of Sept. 30 and during the day Oct. 1, and then met with a larger group of analysts on Oct. 3.

Late on Oct. 3, after the stock had fallen to $17.64, the company put out a news release giving some of the bad news, the S.E.C. said. The shares opened the next day at $16.10, as public investors sent in sell orders.

The stock rallied above $23 in January, but the share price has since declined. Yesterday, the shares rose 45 cents, to $16.

According to the S.E.C., Mr. Kogan provided a litany of negative information, in what he said and in his manner, in meetings with the institutional investors.

''Providing guidance to a select few through a combination of spoken language, tone, emphasis and demeanor, is precisely the kind of unfair advantage that the S.E.C. wants to prevent,'' said Paul R. Berger, the associate director of enforcement at the commission.

On the evening of Sept. 30, Mr. Kogan met with executives from Wellington Management. That firm's drug analyst maintained her buy rating after the meeting, but the next day several of the firm's portfolio managers sold, the S.E.C. said. The price of the stock ranged from $19.45 to $21.80 that day.

On the morning of Oct. 1, Mr. Kogan met with executives of Massachusetts Financial Services, a unit of Sun Life Financial, and then with Fidelity Investments, a unit of FMR, and Putnam Investments, a unit of Marsh & McLennan. The M.F.S. analyst was already cautious on the stock, and that firm owned few shares. But the Fidelity and Putnam analysts, who had been supporters of the stock, turned negative, issuing sell or underperform recommendations the next morning.

Fidelity and Putnam each sold more than 10 million shares from Oct. 1 through Oct. 3, the S.E.C. said, accounting for more than 30 percent of the trading volume in the period. Compared with the prices immediately after the public disclosure, they saved at least $2 a share.

The shares fell further on Oct. 3, during the meeting with other analysts. At that meeting, the S.E.C. said, Mr. Kogan said earnings in 2003 would be ''terrible.''

One Putnam portfolio manager who attended the meeting and sold shares said in a telephone conversation with a Putnam trader, which was recorded, that the meeting had made it clear Schering-Plough would not meet profit expectations.

''It's certainly why we are selling,'' he said, adding that he was at a health conference where other investors were speculating about the weakness in Schering-Plough.

''So, the larger community, anyone who didn't meet with them over the last couple days, doesn't have a clue as to what's going on,'' the Putnam portfolio manager said.

Nancy Fisher, a spokeswoman for Putnam, declined to comment directly about the recorded statements, but said the firm had started selling days before the meeting and that the firm's analyst had indicated that he planned to downgrade the stock.

Anne Crowley, a spokeswoman for Fidelity, said, ''We complied with all rules and regulations in our meeting with Schering-Plough and in our conduct thereafter.'' A call to Wellington Management was not returned.

Under federal law, it is often viewed as insider trading when a trader receives a tip from a company executive about material nonpublic information. But to bring such charges the commission would have to prove that the money managers knew the information was confidential and should not be disclosed. S.E.C. officials would not comment, but there is no indication that any action is contemplated against the institutional investors.

A lawyer for Mr. Kogan, Stanley Sporkin, said: ''There is no evidence that Kogan profited from this. He did not buy or sell stock.''

Mr. Sporkin, a former federal judge and before that the director of enforcement for the S.E.C., added: ''The real message is that C.E.O.'s of companies have to be very careful when they go one-on-one with analysts.''

Schering-Plough announced the S.E.C. settlement but did not comment on it.

Chart: ''For Big Investors, Advance Warning''
Schering-Plough and its former chief executive, Richard J. Kogan, agreed yesterday to pay penalties for what the S.E.C. said were violations of the commissions fair disclosure regulation last fall. At that time the company gave bad news to selected institutional investors before disclosing it to the public .

SEPT. 30 -- Mr. Kogan briefs officials of Wellington Management in the evening.
OCT. 1 -- Mr. Kogan meets with officials of Massachusetts Financial Services, Fidelity Investments and Putnam Investments.
OCT. 2 -- Analysts at Fidelity and Putnam advise managers to sell the stock before trading begins.
OCT. 3 -- Mr. Kogan meets with more analysts and says profits in 2003 will be terrible. At 10:45 p.m., company discloses part of what was told to analysts.

Back to top



Hepatitis C virus infection among drug users in Italy
by gastrohep.com

Anti-HCV status is independently associated with drug use duration and route of administration, find doctors in the September issue of the Journal of Viral Hepatitis (J Viral Hepatitis 2003; 10(5): 394-400).

This study, conducted by researchers from Italy and the United States, assessed the rates and predictors of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in drug users receiving treatment for opiate addiction.

The team evaluated a cohort of 1095 participants in 16 centers for drug users in north-eastern Italy.

They collected data using standardized face-to-face interviews in 2001. 74% were HCV seropositive.

The team found that, of 1095 participants, 74% were HCV seropositive.

They determined that anti-HCV status was independently associated with drug use duration >10 years, injecting, as well as hepatitis B (HBV) and HIV seropositivity.

The physicians analyzed subjects further, based on duration of heroin use (greater or less than 10 years).

They found that both the route of drug administration and HBV status were associated with HCV seropositivity in both groups. However, less education was associated with HCV in the shorter term drug users.

Both HIV status and having a sexual partner with a history of drug use were associated with HCV seropositivity in longer term drug users.

Dr Quaglio's team concluded, "Half of the short-term heroin users were still HCV seronegative when starting treatment, suggesting opportunities for reducing new HCV infections."

"Remarkable was the relationship between vaccination for hepatitis B and HCV serostatus."

"Being HBV seropositive was strongly associated with being HCV seropositive."

"But heroin users who had been vaccinated for HBV were not significantly more likely to be HCV seropositive than heroin users who were HBV
seronegative."

"HBV vaccination does not provide biological protection against HCV; however, vaccinating heroin users against HBV may help to create a stronger pro-health attitude among heroin users, leading to a reduction in HCV risk
behavior."

Back to top



September 12th, 2002



Nigeria bans dangerous relaxant drugs from China

The Nigerian government has banned a family of relaxant drugs imported from China, said to have possible serious side-effects including hepatitis, cirrhosis and liver failure, an official statement said.

The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), the state-run regulatory agency for all drugs in the country, warned Nigerians of the harmful effects of products containing kava-kava and kavaine, said the statement.

Such products, which are easily obtainable on the Nigerian market, are used in the treatment of conditions such as nervous anxiety, stress and restlessness, and to treat the symptoms of menopause, the NAFDAC statement said.

But the drugs—banned by most drug regulatory authorities worldwide and the World Health Organization—have been implicated in serious liver diseases, including hepatitis, cirrhosis and liver failure, it also said.

A top NAFDAC official told AFP Friday that the dangerous drugs have been in circulation in Nigeria for the past three years. Efforts have been stepped up to withdraw them from the market.

Drug importers and the Chinese embassy in Nigeria are cooperating with NAFDAC to enforce the ban, said the official who declined to be named.

Back to top




Life-insurance ban is unfair for many with HIV: Study

A ban on life insurance for people with the AIDS virus is in many cases unjustified, according to the first study to provide hard actuarial evidence about the benefits of anti-retroviral drugs.

Life insurance companies, scared by the mortality rates seen in the early years of the AIDS epidemic, routinely deny insurance to people with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV ) and this can cause big problems for those individuals, in their business and personal lives.

But a Swiss study says the automatic ban fails to take into account the success of antiretrovirals—the drug "cocktail" that emerged in the mid-1990s and which, for many people with HIV, has otherwise prolonged their survivability.

People who respond well to HIV and who do not have hepatitis C have a short-term mortality rate that can be even lower than people who have been successfully treated for cancer and who are usually able to get life insurance, the study says.

Amongst the HIV group, the excess death rate—a figure that compares patients to people without the disease—was below five per thousand patient-years.

Amongst the cancer group, the rate varied from five to 20 per thousand patient-years.

The study, published in this Saturday's issue of the British medical weekly The Lancet, "provides preliminary evidence that life coverage could be considered under specific conditions," the authors say.

However, short-term mortality was significantly higher among HIV patients who had failed to respond to antiretrovirals or who had hepatitis C, a disease linked to intravenous drug use.

The research was led by Bernard Hirschel of Geneva University Hospital, and drew on figures from a six-year-old, ongoing study of Swiss patients with HIV and from national mortality statistics.

Antiretrovirals contain the spread of HIV virus so that the body's immune system remains intact and does not reach the stage of full-blown AIDS, when death can be caused by opportunistic diseases.

These drugs are not a cure, however, and can have toxic side effects.

Their cost, too, is a barrier to treatment. Only recently has the price been lowered sufficiently for developing countries to contemplate distributing the treatment on a wide scale.

Back to top




Prison outreach for the diagnosis and prevention of hepatitis C
by gastrohep.com

Prison outreach clinics are effective in delivering health education, but have a limited effect in eradicating hepatitis C virus in prisoners, finds a team of physicians in the October issue of Gut (Gut 2003; 52: 1500-4).

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major public health problem

A prison environment provides the opportunity for healthcare workers to focus on traditionally hard to reach patients.

In this study, researchers from Southampton, England, assessed the prevalence of HCV infection in a prison cluster. They also evaluated the effectiveness of a prison outreach service for hepatitis C.

The team established a nurse specialist-led clinic within the prisons. This offered health education on hepatitis C, advice on harm minimization, and HCV testing.

Any prisoners infected with HCV were offered access to treatment.

30% of the prisoners tested had active HCV infection.

The research team measure the level of service uptake, and diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis C.

Overall, the team found that 9% of 1618 prisoners in this study accepted testing. They found that 30% of these prisoners had active HCV infection.

However, most prisoners were ineligible for treatment due to psychiatric illness, or did not receive treatment for logistic reasons.

The researchers determined that injecting drug use was the major risk factor in all cases.

The team also found that only 7% of HCV polymerase chain amplification positive inmates received treatment while in prison.

Dr Skipper's team concluded, "There is a large pool of HCV infected prisoners at risk of complications, constituting a source of infection during their sentence and after discharge."

"A prison outreach clinic and care pathway was perceived as effective in delivering health education, reducing the burden on prison and hospital services."

"It provided an opportunity for intervention but had a limited effect in eradicating HCV in prisoners and it remains unclear how this might be achieved."

Back to top


September 14th, 2003



Warning of disease risk on body art
by Mark Gould

Once the preserve of fetish clubs and tribal groups, body art has fought its way into mainstream culture as tattoos and piercings have become the must-have adornment for the young and famous.

David Beckham's body artwork has undermined tattoos' reputation as symbols of rebellion, while Madonna's pierced belly button and Zara Phillips's tongue stud have given body-piercing a more respectable public image. The craze has even reached the aisles of Selfridges, which opened a tattoo and body-piercing concession earlier this year called Metal Morphosis.

But doctors are now warning such fashion accessories could be fatal. Tattoos and body-piercing could lead to a risk of contracting the liver disease hepatitis B, which can be passed on via infected needles.

The Royal College of General Practitioners is urging the fashion-conscious to avoid piercing altogether and opt for stick-on tattoos because hepatitis B rates have doubled in the past 10 years. Dr George Kassianos, a GP and spokesman for the RCGP, said: 'The risk is too great that the (tattoo) parlour has cut corners by re-using tattoo needles or not sterilising equipment. If you want to decorate your body get a transfer - they are usually better quality anyway."

In December last year Sheffield teenager Daniel Hindle, 17, died when he contracted blood poisoning after having his lip pierced. In June a tattoo and piercing parlour in Dundee was closed down amid fears of a hepatitis B infection when health officials found equipment and skin cream contaminated with blood. Public health doctors have found no evidence of hepatitis B but are screening more than 60 customers. The disease can be passed from mothers to newborn babies, and by using infected needles, razors, or toothbrushes and by having unprotected sex.

The risk of passing on the infection is so great that blood donors are banned from donating for 12 months after they have been tattooed or pierced. The National Blood Agency says that one in 10 donors are turned away on any one day because of a new piercing or tattoo.

Last month local authority inspection and hygiene rules previously restricted to body art parlours in London were extended across England in a bid to crack down on infections and botched piercings.

But the doctors' warning prompted a sharp response from body artists. Curly, a tattooist from the Tattoo Club of Great Britain, in Oxford, thought the RCGP's advice was 'unbelievable.'

'What kind of moron says a thing like that? As long as you take sensible hygiene precautions it's perfectly safe. People have been doing it for thousands of years. Twenty or 30 years ago we used the same needle all day without sterilising it and nobody got hepatitis. Now I have got an autoclave where I sterilise the needles and I keep a record of the temperatures they are heated to. I just think people are taking this health and safety thing a bit too far.'

Metal Morphosis 'director and celebrity piercer' David Potasnick said he set up the International School of Body Piercing to raise standards of skill and safety.

'I would like to see stricter regulations placed on piercing to ensure better quality of service through out the industry and I would urge anyone considering getting a piercing to fully research the studio beforehand to ensure that they are in the hands of a licensed professional,' Potasnick said.

There are around 180,000 people with hepatitis B in the UK. But Public Health Laboratory Service figures show that in the past decade the number of new cases has doubled from 400 to more than 800 a year with many new cases in refugees and asylum-seekers.

Kassianos said official fig ures mask a larger group who don't know they have the disease. 'It's estimated there are around 800 new cases a year but there could be as many as 3,500 people newly infected who don't know it and are passing it on.'

The problem is becoming so acute that the government's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation is considering setting up a 2childhood hepatitis B immunisation programme.

Kassianos wants immunisation introduced as soon as possible. 'This is not a racist measure or anti-refugee - the fact that we can all move about the world so easily means that hepatitis B is a problem for the whole population of the UK.'

Last year the prestigious Mayo Clinic carried out the only scientific research on the extent of body art in an unnamed American university. It found that half of all the undergraduates had some form of body piercing. One in five suffered injury or prolonged bleeding and one in 10 had a bacterial infection.

Back to top



September 15th, 2003


Is It Too Late To Save Schering? ; CEO Fred Hassan has a hair-raising task: fixing the drugmaker's problems in the lab, in the plants, and in the market.
John Simons

Fred Hassan talks like a professional therapist. Not in a cooing, I-feel-your-pain, Oprah sort of way, but with a gentle authority that, no matter how harsh the pronouncement, is still soothing. Schering-Plough needs such treatment. Since taking over as CEO of the troubled pharmaceutical company four months ago, Hassan has had to fire senior managers, cut salaries, and shut down research. At the same time, he is campaigning to restore morale within the company and trust outside it. It's a tricky prescription, but his verbal balm is soothing.

On a Friday in July, Hassan is doing it again, this time in a small meeting room on the grounds of Schering's sprawling Kenilworth, N.J., headquarters. Eleven midlevel researchers are seated around the table eating cold cuts and potato salad. Hassan has called them together to hear their opinions on what ails Schering. A computer technician speaks up, arguing that new drug applications go through too many hoops before going to the Food and Drug Administration. "I'm sensing that because we made mistakes in the past, 'speed' is a bad word around here," says Hassan in his mild Pakistani accent. "Am I right?" Everyone nods. The technician, as if waiting for years for someone to utter those words, lets out a long "yessss."

His management style may seem soft and fuzzy, but Hassan insists that it is the stuff of which great CEOs are made. Doing well in business, he says, is about "getting to the hearts of people—that's something you don't learn in business school. Can you teach someone to engender trust? That separates leaders from managers."

All that's nice. But no one will really care unless it means Hassan can fix Schering. With annual sales of $10.1 billion, it is the country's ninth-largest drug firm. It specializes in allergy and respiratory drugs and anti-infection, cancer, and cardiovascular treatments. The company is best known for Claritin, the breakthrough allergy medicine that didn't make users drowsy. Schering also produces such respiratory drugs as Afrin and Nasonex; foot-care products like Dr. Scholl's insoles; antifungal medicines Lotrimin and Tinactin; Coppertone and Bain de Soleil sunscreen products; and animal health treatments.

Until recently investors loved Schering-Plough, and it's easy to see why. In 2000 the company posted its 15th consecutive year of double-digit growth in earnings per share and raised its dividend for the 17th time since 1986. During the 1990s its shares soared 978%.

But Big Pharma is suffering through difficult times. Since 2000 the S&P pharmaceuticals index has fallen 19%, while the S&P 500 is off 13%, and the drug industry has not recovered as fast. While every drug company faces serious challenges in one or two areas, Schering has problems in all of them—sales, marketing, research, and manufacturing. Take a look at sales. The most important thing to know is that revenues are dwindling--fast. At its peak in 2001, Claritin generated $3.2 billion, almost a third of Schering's total revenues. Since Claritin lost its patent protection last year, cheaper knockoffs have cut its sales by 97%, and management bungled the introduction of its successor, Clarinex. Schering's next- largest franchise, the Intron family of hepatitis C medicines (sales in 2002: $2.7 billion), is also losing ground.

In the labs Schering is mediocre at turning R&D investment into patents (see chart). The single bright spot is Zetia, a cholesterol- lowering drug developed as a joint venture with Merck. Zetia could generate $711 million for Schering by 2006.

The manufacturing division is even more troubled. Executives entered a consent agreement in May 2002 in response to the FDA's accusations of unsafe manufacturing practices, such as the production of defective tablets and asthma inhalers (see "Bitter Medicine," on fortune.com). The FDA imposed its largest fine ever-- $500 million--and forced Schering to bolster its oversight of production, which is proving costly.

Schering is also the subject of a separate FDA criminal investigation into whether company officials knowingly distributed faulty products. In addition, the attorneys general of Massachusetts and Pennsylvania are investigating allegations that the sales division marketed certain drugs for unapproved or "off label" uses. And the SEC is looking into a charge of selective disclosure of financial information.

Put it all together, and it is no surprise that Schering's net income for the first half of 2003 dropped 71%, to $355 million, from $1.2 billion the previous year. The stock has lost almost 75% of its value since November 2000 (see chart) and could drop further after the recent announcement of a sharp cut in the dividend. Hassan did not help matters when he failed to participate in an Aug. 21 conference call to explain the decision. Even friendly analysts were piqued by his absence.

Ducking the analysts was uncharacteristic for Hassan. What sets him apart from other CEOs in the industry is that he is, first and foremost, a communicator. Sure, he's been known to stand at a podium flipping slides while droning on about "seamless product flow." And he isn't exactly Mr. Flair. His suits range in color from slate to charcoal. His ties run the gamut from red to maroon. His shirts are white. It's a safe bet that his base annual salary of $1.5 million (through 2006), plus stock and options worth $14 million, will not be spent on frippery.

His formal demeanor, however, is not a forbidding one. Hassan likes to talk tactics with salespeople and show off his scientific background with the techies. In the numerous large town-hall meetings and smaller roundtables he has held to engage workers, people are not afraid to say tough things. One evening in early August, for example, he's having dinner with salespeople from the New York--New Jersey region. He has barely stuck a fork into his roasted chicken when the complaints start: The staff wants more products to sell and is tired of fending off rants about the company's problems. The main question: Is he planning to do away with the 60-40 salary-commission split? Hassan gives it to them straight. "The problem," he says, is that the commission is "just too high." The industry standard is 30%.

After each meeting, Hassan answers employees via e-mail. As with the salespeople, he cannot always tell employees what they want to hear. Still, the fact that he is trying to communicate comes across loud and clear. After one roundtable, a researcher comments, "I couldn't tell you what the former CEO [Richard Jay Kogan] looked like. We got an e-mail from him once a year. That was it."

One asset Hassan can count on is that Schering's 30,000 employees haven't given up. "When I leave here sometimes around seven at night, I still see many cars in the parking lot. That's a good sign," he says. "Now, whether they're waiting for traffic on the New Jersey Turnpike to clear up is another question."

Farid Hassan (his original name) left Pakistan at age 17 to study chemical engineering at the University of London. He stumbled into business when he returned to Pakistan in 1967 and began a painfully boring job at a fertilizer plant. In the meantime he met his wife, Noreen, whom he credits with helping him recognize his aptitude for management. By the summer of 1970 the newly married Hassan was off to Harvard Business School. After graduation he took a job with Sandoz Pharmaceutical Corp. (now Novartis). It was there that he began pulling off a string of turnarounds. In 1975, Sandoz executives sent Hassan to Lincoln to reorganize a marketing unit in disarray. He did. Five years later he went back to Pakistan to run the company's then-miserable operations. Within three years the unit went from the No. 15 drug seller to No. 4. By 1987, Hassan had become CEO of Sandoz. He left to take the top job at Wyeth in 1989. In 1997, he became CEO of Pharmacia, two years into a disastrous merger of Sweden's Pharmacia and Upjohn Co. of Kalamazoo, Mich.

Cultural differences were at the heart of the problem. In one case Pharmacia's European managers—who ran their own marketing and research operations—ignored a promising antibiotic known as Zyvox simply because it had been developed in Kalamazoo. Rather than fight one cultural battle after another, Hassan moved the company's headquarters from England to northern New Jersey. That consolidated the company in new territory. He also merged the various marketing and research efforts.

On Hassan's watch Pharmacia's revenues grew from $8.9 billion to $14 billion, while earnings per share tripled. In 2000 he orchestrated a merger with Monsanto, which brought in Celebrex, the company's top-selling arthritis pain reliever (sales last year: $3 billion). Pfizer took notice, paying $60 billion to acquire Pharmacia in 2002. Critics say that a genuine turnaround would have enabled Pharmacia to stay independent. That is a debate for the business schools: The fact is, Hassan put himself out of a job— and made Pharmacia shareholders very happy.

If he can turn around Schering, Hassan could become one of the most influential pharma executives in the country. True to his orderly ways, he ticks off a plan: "One, stabilize; two, repair; three, turn around; four, build the base; and five, break out." For the past few months he has tackled the first and second steps: investigating problems, looking at the books, and figuring out where to cut costs. In late August he announced plans to eliminate nearly $200 million in annual spending. A thousand jobs will go, as well as the company jet, merit salary increases, the executive dining room, and bonuses (including his own). In an e-mail to employees Hassan reinforced the new tenor of austerity. "We must attack our cost structure with a renewed sense of urgency," he wrote. "Each person in our organization must think like an owner." The most draconian measure was to cut