Sunday Poster Sessions, October 29, 2006
Transplant Plenary Sessions 1 and 2
M. K. Osborn; A. Regev; S. Han; N. Bzowej; M. Ishitani; T. Tran; A. S. Lok.
Background/Aim:
Resistance to antiviral therapy can lead to hepatitis flares,
liver failure and death. We determine if rescue therapy prevents adverse
outcomes in patients (pts) with HBV who developed antiviral failure while
awaiting OLT.
Methods:
Data for pts enrolled in the NIH HBV-OLT observational study
who received antiviral therapy before OLT and had ≥6 mos
follow-up on the waiting list were reviewed. Pts with HCV or HIV, fulminant HBV
or retransplantation for recurrent HBV were excluded.
Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to compare transplant-free survival and
survival without transplant between pts who developed antiviral failure (viral
breakthrough ± confirmed genotypic resistance) and those who did not. Cox
regression models were used to determine factors associated with outcomes.
Other covariates were gender, race, age at listing, laboratory values
(including MELD) at listing, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at listing.
Results:
122 pts received antiviral therapy pre-OLT for a median of
40.4 mos (range 0.4-123) until transplant or last
follow-up. Initial therapy was lamivudine (LAM) in 110 (90%) pts, adefovir
(ADV) in 7 (6%) pts and other in 5 pts. Of the 44 (36.1%) pts who developed
antiviral failure (30 with confirmed genotypic resistance), all received LAM as
initial therapy. Rescue therapy was administered in 42 pts at a median of 5.2 mos (range 0-79.4) after antiviral failure was diagnosed.
Most pts were clinically stable (median MELD 12) at the time rescue therapy was
started. The most common rescue therapies were ADV monotherapy in 20 and
ADV+LAM in 19 pts. After a median follow-up of 22.6 mos
(range 0-99.8) from diagnosis of antiviral failure, 23/44 were alive on the OLT
waiting list, 8 were withdrawn from the study (2 improved, none for worsening),
and 4 died while in study (3 due to liver failure). 9 pts had OLT, 1 within 6
months of antiviral failure; none had HBV recurrence after 11.3-36.2 mos of post-OLT follow-up. Actuarial rates of
transplant-free survival 1 and 5 years after listing were 97.6% and 67.5% for
those with antiviral failure and 81.9% and 60.8% for those without failure
(p=0.09). Actuarial rates of survival without transplant at 1 and 5 years were
97.5% and 83.3% and 91.6% and 84.9% for pts with and without antiviral failure
(p=0.39). Multivariate predictors of death or transplant were high MELD score,
HCC, and low albumin. Low MELD score and high albumin were predictors of
survival without transplant.
Conclusion:
Our data suggest that antiviral failure in HBV pts on the OLT
waiting list did not significantly affect survival compared to those without
failure if rescue therapy was promptly initiated.
N.
H. Bzowej; D. Nelson; J. A. Thommes;
F. M. Hamzeh; M. Charlton.
Introduction:
Recurrent HCV infection following OLT is universal and can
cause graft failure and death. Safety concerns, especially the risks of anemia, neutropenia and acute cellular rejection (ACR),
have limited prophylactic/early treatment with pegylated interferon plus
ribavirin in OLT recipients, and prophylaxis has not been investigated in a
randomized controlled trial. The
Methods:
Patients were randomized 10 to 26 wks after OLT. Patients in
the prophylaxis arm received 135 μg
peginterferon alfa-2a/wk for 4 wks, followed by 180 μg/wk
for 44 wks; plus 400 mg/d ribavirin (initial dose), escalating to 1200 mg/d,
for 48 wks. Patients in the observation arm were treated with the same regimen
only upon histologic recurrence of HCV (HAI >3
and/or FS >2).
Results:
To date, 33 patients have been randomized to the prophylaxis
arm (32 have received at least 1 dose of study medication, 1 withdrew consent)
and 27 to the observation arm, and 25 patients in each arm have completed 12
study wks. Thirty patients in the prophylaxis arm (94%) and 22 in the
observation arm (82%) have experienced at least 1 adverse event (AE); and 6
(19%) and 4 (15%), respectively, have experienced at least 1 serious AE. The
most common treatment associated AE in the prophylaxis arm has been fatigue (18
patients, 56%). Treatment has been modified or interrupted in 17 patients in
the prophylaxis arm (53%) and in 3 of 4 patients in the observation arm with
HCV recurrence (75%). The frequency of peginterferon alfa-2a and/or ribavirin
dose reductions due to anemia, neutropenia and
thrombocytopenia in the prophylaxis arm were 37.5%, 25% and 13%, respectively.
Six prophylaxis arm patients (19%) have withdrawn from study medications for AEs – 1 from peginterferon alfa-2a due to rash and from
ribavirin due to anemia; 1 from ribavirin only due to
anemia; and 1 each from both medications due to
thrombocytopenia, increased bilirubin, dehydration and neutropenia. No
clinically apparent episodes of ACR have occurred.
Conclusion:
Although AEs are common during
prophylaxis treatment for post-OLT HCV recurrence, only 19% of patients
experienced AEs necessitating treatment withdrawal.
During the first 12 wks, no signs of ACR have occurred in either study arm. These
preliminary findings suggest that prophylaxis with peginterferon alfa-2a plus
ribavirin is relatively safe and well-tolerated in OLT recipients.
A.
Kuo; B. Lan; S. Feng; N. A. Terrault.
Introduction:
Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver
transplantation leads to progressive fibrosis and is the most common cause of
graft loss. Strategies to prevent histological progression are urgently needed.
Preemptive antiviral therapy has not been shown to
increase the rate of viral clearance post-transplantation but the impact of
early antiviral therapy on fibrosis progression is unknown.
Aim:
We sought to determine whether preemptive
antiviral therapy with interferon +/- ribavirin slows fibrosis progression.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed a prospective cohort of
consecutive adult patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for chronic
HCV at UCSF from December 1998 to June 2002 and who received preemptive antiviral therapy (begun between week 2-6
post-transplant) with standard interferon (IFN) or pegylated-interferon alfa-2b
or IFN/peg-IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks. Fibrosis was assessed using Ludwig-Batts score (F0-F4). Biopsies were obtained approximately
annually and as clinically indicated. Non-preemptive
therapy patients were censored at the start of antiviral therapy for recurrent
disease, as were preemptive patients who were retreated.
Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess time to fibrosis score (FS) ≥2
(scale of 4) in the preemptive vs. the non-preemptive groups. Other factors influencing fibrosis were
controlled for in final multivariate models.
Results:
106 adult LT were performed with 85 patients meeting all
inclusion criteria. A total of 46 patients received preemptive
therapy with 4 (8.7%) patients achieving sustained virologic response (SVR); 39
patients did not receive preemptive therapy. Patients
were predominantly male (72%) with median age 50 years (35-70), median donor
age 40 (9-70), 67 (78.8%) deceased donors, and median follow-up 40 months
(3.6-90.3). The median histological follow-up was 46.0 (4.1-90.3) and 32.2
(3.6-83.5) months in preemptive and non-preemptive groups. Time to FS ≥2 was not
significantly different between groups (log-rank test, p=0.16; figure) and the
median time to FS ≥2 was 40.5 vs. 33.4 months in the preemptive
and non-preemptive groups. There was no significant
difference after adjusting for recipient age, donor age or SVR. Similar results
were obtained when patients achieving SVR were excluded.
Conclusions:
Preemptive antiviral therapy of HCV does not
appear to slow fibrosis progression although a late effect cannot be excluded.
However, given the low rate of virological response and lack of obvious
histological benefits, this treatment strategy cannot be recommended.
Y.
Calmus; D. Samuel; G. Pageaux;
M. Messner; P. Wolf; L. Rostaing;
C. Vanlemmens; Y. Le Treut;
S. Dharancy; J. Gugenheim;
F. Durand; M. Néau-Cransac; O. Boilot;
O. Chazouillčres; L. Samelson;
K. Boudjema; C. Duvoux.
Aim:
The aim of this randomized, double-blind study was to
determine the effect of placebo or maintenance therapy with ribavirin (RBV)
monotherapy, after a year of combination therapy with peginterferon-alfa
2a (PEG-IFNα-2a) and RBV, on continued eradication of HCV after liver
transplantation (LT). Here, we report the interim, pooled data from both
treatment arms obtained at 18 months (6 months after the end of combination
therapy).
Methods:
The study enrolled 101 patients with recurrent HCV and a
minimum of stage 1 fibrosis (METAVIR scoring) on a liver biopsy obtained 1–5
years after LT. PEG-IFNα-2a and RBV were initiated at 90 µg/wk and 600
mg/d, respectively, and increased to 180 µg/wk and 1000 mg/d or adjusted as a
function of hematological tolerance. At week 52,
combination therapy was discontinued and patients were randomized to RBV alone
or placebo for a further 48 weeks (blinded). 75% of patients received tacrolimus and 25% cyclosporine. Growth factor use was
permitted.
Results:
At the end of combination therapy at 52 weeks, 61% of all
patients (62/101) and 75% of those who completed 52 weeks’ therapy (62/83)
achieved a virological response (VR; undetectable HCV-RNA). 37% of patients
required erythropoietin (EPO) support and 12% G-CSF during combination therapy.
At 78 weeks, a VR was obtained in 39% of ITT patients
(39/100) and 50%(39/77) of PP patients: 70.6% of patients with genotype 2/3 and
32.5% of those with genotype 1/4 (p=0.004). VR was numerically higher in
patients receiving cyclosporine (52.2%) than those receiving tacrolimus (36.6%; p=0.2), and in patients treated >2
years post LT (46.3%) than <2 years (29.8%; p=0.09). Serious
antiviral-related adverse effects were observed in 15 patients: acute rejection
(2), severe cytopenia requiring antiviral therapy
discontinuation (7), acute renal failure (2), ischemic cardiopathy
(2), psychiatric disorders (2), and diabetes (2).
Conclusion:
A virological response at 18 months, after 1 year’s
combination therapy with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin followed by 6
months’ ribavirin monotherapy or placebo, was achieved in 50% of patients
following liver transplantation in PP analysis. Study end is planned in July,
so final results will be presented at the congress.
D.
Bitetto; E. Fontanini; A. Cussigh; E. Falleti; C. Fabris; E. Rossi; R. Minisini; A.
Limoncini; P. Toniutto; M. Pirisi.
Introduction:
It has been suggested that the MTHFR C677T polymorphism,
known to increase susceptibility to hyperhomocysteinemia,
may favour fibrosis progression in immune competent patients with chronic
hepatitis C by being a steatogenic factor. Aim of
this study was to verify the role of recipient MTHFR polymorphism in favouring
graft fibrosis progression in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver
transplantation (OLT).
Methods:
We studied 60 consecutive patients (41 males), median age 56
years, who underwent OLT between 1996 and 2004 for hepatitis C and were
followed-up for >1 year. Thirty-one patients underwent combination antiviral
therapy for hepatitis C, started a median of 14 months after OLT and completed as
scheduled by 19/31. The speed of fibrosis progression, expressed in fibrosis
units per month (FU/mo), was calculated dividing the histological staging in a
protocol liver biopsy by the time interval elapsed from OLT in the first year
post OLT. MTHFR allelic variants were determined in peripheral blood samples by
means of a PCR/restriction fragment length polymorphism procedure.
Results:
MTHFR genotypes, in equilibrium according to Hardy-Weinberg
equation (p>0.10), were: CC = 19 (32%), CT = 34 (56%) and TT = 7 (12%). The
TT genotype was not associated with recipient’s gender or age. TT patients had
more frequently, one year post OLT, either serum triglycerides >150 mg/dl
(5/21 vs 2/39 p<0.05) or a
triglycerides/cholesterol ratio >1.0 (5/19 vs 2/41
p<0.02). Patients with a TT genotype had more frequently a one year post OLT
fibrosis progression >0.100 FU/mo (5/19 vs 2/41
p<0.02); on the contrary, the TT genotype was not associated with liver
steatosis (5/37 vs 2/23 p>0.10). First year
fibrosis progression >0.100 FU/mo was strongly related to donor age >45
years (13/26 vs 6/34 p<0.01). Time to event
analysis in reaching an Ishak staging score >2 was performed stratifying the
patients as follows: A) patients with donor age ≤45 years, B) patients
with donor age >45 and C/* genotype, C) patients with donor age >45 years
and TT genotype. A significant linear trend was observed, with increasing
frequencies as follows: A) 7/34, B) 10/19 and C) 6/7 (p=0.0005).
Conclusion:
The MTHFR C677T polymorphism may play a role in influencing
liver fibrosis progression in patients with recurrent hepatitis C, in
conjunction with donor age, but not via steatosis promotion. Early fibrosis
progression may be favoured in recipients with a TT genotype by mechanisms
involving their lipid asset, since lipoprotein and lipoprotein receptors are
involved in HCV protection from neutralising antibodies in the circulation and
viral entry into the hepatocytes.
E.
S. Baskin-Bey; K. Washburn; S. Feng;
T. Oltersdorf; D. Shapiro; L. Burgart;
M. Garrity-Park; F. van Vilsteren;
L. K. Oliver; C. B. Rosen; G. Gores.
Introduction:
Liver preservation injury remains a clinical problem in liver
transplantation. Apoptosis, a form of cell death, is a critical mechanism of
hepatic preservation injury. Intracellular proteases referred to as caspases, mediate apoptosis and their inhibition can block
this cell death program. Recently IDN-6556, an irreversible pan-caspase inhibitor has been shown to reduce preservation
injury in rodent models.
Aim:
Thus, the AIM of the current study was to assess the utility
of IDN-6556 in human liver transplantation.
Methods:
This study was conducted as a multi-center, Phase II,
randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, parallel group study. Subjects
were assigned to four treatment groups: Group I; n=23 (Organ storage/flush:
Placebo - Recipient: Placebo); Group 2; n=23 (Organ storage/flush: 15 µg/mL -
Recipient: Placebo); Group 3; n=27 (Organ storage/flush: 5 µg/mL - Recipient:
0.5 mg/kg); and Group 4; n=26 (Organ storage/flush: 15 µg/mL - Recipient: 0.5
mg/kg) (total n=99). IDN-6556 was administered to the organ in cold storage and
flush solutions and to the recipient intravenously every six hours for 24 hours
after transplantation. Apoptosis was assessed by serum concentrations of the
apoptosis-associated CK18Asp396 (“M30”) neo-epitope,
TUNEL assay, and caspase 3/7 immunostaining
of liver specimens. Liver injury was assessed by serum AST/ALT determinations.
Results:
The results represent a post hoc data analysis. Serum M30
concentrations were greater than 5-fold above normal, signifying the presence
of massive apoptosis during human liver transplantation. Group 1 (placebo) was
distinctly higher than groups 2, 3 or 4 during the first 24 hours after liver
transplantation. TUNEL and caspase 3/7 positive cells
were reduced in Group 2 from liver specimens obtained after reperfusion during
transplantation, when compared to all groups. Similarly, Group 2 consistently
showed a significant reduction in ALT/AST levels following transplantation,
compared to all treatment groups (p<0.01). One center performed day 7 protocol
liver biopsies (n=35), which permitted the assessment of delayed consequences
of CI/WR injury. In these specimens, analyses of Group 2 demonstrated reduced
neutrophil infiltrate; the latter being a cellular component of preservation
injury. No post-operative adverse events were attributed to the treatment.
Conclusion:
IDN-6556 when administered in cold storage and flush
solutions appears promising as a therapeutic agent to minimize CI/WR injury in
human liver transplantation. Larger studies are required to determine its
actual benefit.
F.
Y. Yao; L. Xiao; N. M. Bass; R. K. Kerlan; N. L. Ascher; J. P. Roberts.
Background:
We have previously reported that modest expansion of
conventional criteria for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) based on explant pathology in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) did not adversely impact survival (UCSF criteria - 1 lesion within 6.5 cm
or 2 to 3 lesions none exceeding 4.5 cm with total tumor
diameter up to 8 cm). In the present study, we attempted to validate the UCSF
criteria according to pre-transplant imaging with 5-year follow-up.
Methods:
Between January 2001 and January 2006, we have prospectively
applied the UCSF criteria for OLT based on pre-operative radiologic
staging in 138 patients. Staging within 3 months prior to OLT revealed T1 HCC
(1 lesion <2 cm) in 8 patients, T2 (1 lesion 2 to 5 cm, or 2 to 3 lesions
none exceeding 3 cm) in 98 patients, and T3A (exceeding T2 but meeting UCSF
criteria) in 32 patients. Ninety-eight patients (70% for T1/T2 and 75% for T3A)
received elective pre-operative loco-regional therapies.
Results:
The median follow-up was 24 months (range 1-64 months), with
a minimal follow-up of 6 months among survivors. The 1- and 5- year
Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free probabilities were 95% and 91%, respectively. The
1- and 5-year probabilities for survival without recurrence were 91% and 80%,
respectively. The 106 patients with radiologic T1 or
T2 HCC had 1- and 5- year recurrence-free probabilities of 96% and 90%,
respectively, versus 93% at both 1 and 5 years for the 32 patients with radiologic T3A stage (p=0.82). The 22 patients with explant pathologic HCC stage >T3A had 1- and 5- year
recurrence-free probabilities of 79% and 61%, respectively, versus 98% and 97%,
respectively, for the 116 patients with pathologic HCC stage within T3A
(p<0.0001). Predictors of HCC recurrence in univariate
analysis included pathologic stage >T3A (HR 16.4, p=0.0005), micro-vascular
invasion (HR 16.9, P<0.0001) and alpha-fetoprotein >1000 ng/mL (HR 7.8, P=0.003). Explant tumor necrosis >60% was associated with a significantly
lower risk for HCC recurrence (HR 0.11, P=0.035). Radiologic
T3A stage (versus T1+T2), poorly differentiated histologic
grade and LDLT were not predictive of HCC recurrence. Tumor
under-staging was observed in 20.8% with T1 or T2 HCC, and 28.1% with T3A HCC
(p=0.64). Among them, HCC recurrence was found in 5 of 22 patients (22.7%)
under-staged as T1 or T2 and 2 of 9 patients (22.2%) underestimated as T3A.
Conclusion:
Our results validate the ability of the UCSF criteria to
discriminate prognosis for HCC after OLT, and to serve as selection criteria
based on radiologic tumor
staging, without resulting in a significantly higher risk for tumor under-staging or recurrence.
S.
A. Shah; G. A. Levy; I. D. McGilvray; R. Smith; L. D.
Adcock; N. Girgrah; L. B. Lilly; P. D. Greig; M. S. Cattral; D. R.
Grant.
Introduction:
Right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) has not
been adopted as a fully accepted therapy for patients with end-stage liver
failure (ESLD) in the western hemisphere because of concerns about donor safety
and potentially inferior recipient outcomes.
Methods:
An analysis of outcomes from the time of listing for all
adult patients who were listed for liver transplantation from 2000-2006 at our
center was performed. Populations were compared using descriptive statistics,
chi-square tests, and log rank analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
Results:
From 04/2000 to 04/2006, 1091 patients were listed for liver
transplantation. 154 patients (Group 1; 14%) had suitable live donors and
underwent RLDLT. No patient were removed from the waiting list or died with a
suitable live donor available. There were no live donor deaths and no donor
suffered any permanent disability. Of the remaining patients (Group 2; n=937),
350 underwent DDLT; 299 died or dropped off the waiting list; and 288 were
still waiting at the time of this analysis. Recipient age, diagnosis, and
hospital status, were not different between the two groups. Group 1 had shorter
mean waiting times (6.0 vs. 9.4 months; p<0.001). Groups 1 and 2 had similar
medical MELD scores at the time of listing (14.7 vs. 15.8; p = 0.142). Medical
MELD scores at the time of transplant were significantly different between
RLDLT and DDLT (15.4 vs. 19.5;p = 0.002) Patients in Group 1 had a significant
survival advantage with RLDLT from the time of listing (Figure 1; p<0.001).
From 2000-2006, ninety-day, 1-year and 5-year patient survival after
transplantation were equivalent (RLDLT: 99%, 91%, 80% vs. DDLT: 97%, 93%, 81%;
p=0.764).
Conclusions:
To our knowledge, this is the first report to document a
survival advantage at time of listing for RLDLT over DDLT. With experience,
survival after RLDLT is comparable to survival after DDLT.
T.
L. Pruett; J. R. Freeman; P. S. Appelbaum; B. W.
Gillespie; D. R. Armstrong; J. C. Emond; R. M. Weinrieb; D. C. Nixon; S. and the A2ALL.
Background:
Competence to consent to living organ donation is typically
assessed via subjective interview techniques that lack empirical reliability
and validity. This study assessed the reliability and preliminary validity of a
video version of the MacArthur competence measure (MacCAT-CR)
designed to: 1) standardize educational information to aid informed decisions by
potential living liver donors, and 2) capture audiovisual data via computer
interface that can be reliably rated to assess competency to consent to living
liver donation.
Method:
Twenty-six potential donors at six A2ALL sites viewed an
educational video created to provide information on the risks and benefits of
live liver donation. They then completed the on-line MacCAT
questionnaire, filmed for later review. The video MacCAT
assesses four domains: Understanding the process, risks, and benefits; Appreciating
the personal impact; Expressing a decision; and Reasoning for the decision, for
36 total points. The video recordings were rated by two coders using
pre-agreed, structured, scoring criteria. Recordings were given 0, 1, or 2
points based on the completeness of responses. Interrater
reliability and group means on the four domains were examined.
Results:
Mean total scores did not differ between coders (28.8 vs.
29.1, p=0.212) and there was high interrater
consistency for total scores with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.96
(p<0.001), suggesting interrater agreement.
Participants showed solid Understanding (mean 17.4; SD 3.1; 79% of maximum 22
points), Appreciation (mean 4.9; SD 1.0; 82% of maximum 6 points), Expressing a
decision (mean 3.7; SD 0.6; 93% of maximum 4 points), and Reasoning (mean 3.0;
SD 0.8; 75% of maximum 4 points). Results were conservative, as 3 missing items
were scored as zero.
Conclusions:
Independent raters
coded audiovisual data with high agreement, suggesting the video MacCAT is a reliable tool to assess competency.
Participants showed solid Understanding, Appreciation, Expression of a choice,
and Reasoning of choice regarding liver donation. Also, in contrast to the
traditional interviewer-administered MacCAT-CR, there
were no opportunities to query vague or incomplete responses, or re-disclose
information, which would enhance performance, particularly on Understanding and
Reasoning. Based on these early results, the MacCAT-CR
appears to provide portable and reliable assessment of competency for living
liver donation, with the caveat that it does not formally assess for coercion
or motive. Future work will include establishing criteria for acceptable
competency and mechanisms for feedback to the transplant sites for follow up.